A Magistrate’s duty to keep a written record of the reasons for judgment: yet another appeal against conviction

In Whitehurst v Miller [2017] SC Bda 31 App, Chief Justice Kawaley has once again allowed an appeal against conviction in the Magistrate’s Court, on account of a Magistrate’s apparent failure to make or keep a written record of his reasons for his judgment, in breach of section 83 of the Criminal Jurisdiction and Procedure Act 2015.

The Chief Justice obviously felt that the prosecution case was strong enough to warrant a re-trial, but he stressed, once again, the fundamental importance of an adequate record being kept of a Magistrate’s reasons for judgment.

In fairness to the Magistrates of Bermuda, it is important to recognise that they have to deal with an enormous number of cases, both civil and criminal, with significant constraints on their resources and budgets. It is perhaps no surprise that, in a summary jurisdiction, one sometimes encounters summary justice.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s